COLOMBIAN STEREOTYPES
There are a lot of Colombian stereotypes all over the world, it is also
pretty known that we are basically recognized as the drug dealers’ country, but
some these stereotypes are that, stereotypes. Even though our history does not
really contribute to create a good view from the outside, we are more than just
stereotypes or bad thoughts. People may think we are lazy or that we are mad
the whole time (People from some regions of Colombia, like Santandereanos, tend
to be angry, but this of course creates a feeling of overgeneralization), as in
order countries, Colombian people are not used to be given everything they
need, people from very young ages start working because they feel the necessity
to do it (not matter the reason why).
The biggest stereotype of all, Colombians
being drug dealers or drug consumers; we have a strong and almost undestroyed
history of drug dealers, the most recognized of is of course Pablo Escobar, but
again, outsiders do not know the “good part” behind Pablo Escobar; he was a
good citizen too, he did care about family and about other people, his imperium
helped people to get job and he also contributed to the construction of houses
for the poor. Colombians may know this, but foreigners do not know it.
As in every country, there is a
huge amount of stereotypes, people believe we Colombians all have “the rhythm
in our blood” but there are some people that do not even know how to dance a
good merengue.
The world and each country will be
better if we just stopped thinking about people the way we do, we are not lazy,
we are not suicidal, we are not a drug dealers country, Colombia has a lot of strengths
such as being a rich country in diversity, from pink dolphins to the most
beautiful parrots. We should be known for these things and not for the wrong
ones.
2 Part:
Underlying Assumptions:
Students
must be less political than they used to be is a clear
assumption as it is pretty obvious that students seem to be involved in all the
political context, students even have met in important meetings with
politicians. We are more political than we used to be.
Students
must be less political than they used to be is a clear
assumption as it is pretty obvious that students seem to be involved in all the
political context, students even have met in important meetings with
politicians. We are more political than we used to be.
False Premises:
This argument is based on a false premise because they are not taking into account that there may be some people getting divorced in that period of time, the premise is also false because as they affirm everybody will be married, they are including in somehow to babies and very young people.
Implicit Arguments:
The implicit argument here is that
the daughters are not being considered able to manage the caring of a farm or
estate; there is another implicit argument which basically states that Mr
Andrew Potts, as being a man, is capable of providing sustainability for the
estate.
Stereotypes:
This is a very common stereotype
and it has been present in societies through ages, but girls now have decided
to turn it down; girls are choosing now dark colors and they have integrated
into their wardrobes. Black color has been named as the color of the glamour,
and most women will choose it for an important meeting.
Assuming causal linksHere, the dead, bloody man on the kitchen is link to the fact that the lock of the door was broken and the blood is linked to the knife; but the possibilities can be others. Where the knife came from will be a good question to ask, who is the man in the kitchen, is he the thief or the house owner, he cut himself by accident or was he hurt. This must be clarified, but of course without these arguments, the author couldn’t be able to draw the conclusion.
Identifying the nature of the
link
In this example, the reasons
support firmly the conclusion because the reasons are real and they contribute
to the conclusion to be precise as well.
They are comparing the foundation
of a building with the basis of an argument; foundation and basis are likely to
be the same, so if they both are not well then both will collapse, therefore,
the analogy is correct.




Comentarios
Publicar un comentario